Architecture overview
How Tau is split into three layers — and why that boundary is the whole point.
Tau is deliberately small and layered. The most important design idea is a boundary: the reusable agent “brain” knows nothing about terminals, file paths, or rendering. Everything app-specific wraps around it.
Three packages
tau_coding → tau_agent → tau_ai
tau_ai — talking to models
Owns provider-specific model streaming. It translates each provider’s API (OpenAI, Anthropic, …) into Tau’s provider-neutral event stream, so nothing above it has to care which model vendor is in use.
tau_agent — the portable brain
Owns the reusable agent core: messages, tools, events, the agent loop, the harness, and session primitives. This package must not import CLI, Rich, Textual, or resource-loading code. That’s what keeps it portable.
tau_coding — the coding application
Owns everything that makes Tau a coding agent you run: the CLI, the built-in tools, project instructions, skills and prompts, sessions on disk, provider configuration, and the Textual TUI.
Local-backend boundary
Local inference belongs to tau_coding, not the portable agent core. A staged
extension runtime owns a source- and generation-aware local-backend registry
beside its provider registry. Backends return typed configuration, status,
progress, diagnostics, and capability values; the Textual adapter renders them
and owns cancellation, confirmation, and idle checks. Pairing each backend with
its exact source-owned provider layer prevents a shadowing extension from using
or resetting another source’s integration. See the local backends
guide.
Phase 6 validates the boundary with a permanent second fake backend and a
test-only Ollama adapter. Provider discovery and backend status may use
separate endpoints, installed/running state fits generic model state, and
NoAuth needs no special-case backend API. Refresh cancellation is bounded and
generation-safe; late work cannot publish after retirement. Router mutations
remain a later phase.
TUI and print startup share the same trust-aware preparation boundary: load the trusted built-ins and eligible extensions, restore safe dynamic snapshots, resolve an explicit provider/model, then construct the candidate runtime. A saved llama.cpp snapshot can therefore support explicit startup during server downtime without making the local backend an implicit fallback.
Dependency direction
Dependencies only point one way: tau_coding → tau_agent → tau_ai. UI code
consumes events; the core never reaches up to render anything. In one line:
AgentHarness = reusable brain
CodingSession = coding-agent environment
TUI = one possible frontend
Why the boundary matters
Because the core is UI-free, the same agent can drive print mode, the Textual TUI, or a frontend you build yourself — all by consuming the same event stream. That’s also what makes Tau readable: each layer answers one question, and you can study it without untangling the others.
→ Next: The agent loop & events · Design principles · Build your own frontend
Going deeper
dev-notes/ (not on this site). See Contributing.